And those results wereРІР‚В¦ also pretty good! Then Intel itself weighed in with a very Apple-specific presentation comparing M1 against its own Core i7 processor. It was equally inevitable that x86 partisans would benchmark equivalent Intel processors. A home run, then? A big technological win for Apple? MaybeРІР‚В¦ maybe not.

And the results wereРІР‚В¦ pretty good! The M1 seems fast and it appears to deliver good battery life. But better how? Was the Cupertino company simply looking to save money? To reduce power consumption? Improve performance? Gain control over its CPU roadmap? All of the above?Р”Р„s soon as M1-based Macs went on sale, people started benchmarking them. What, exactly, are you measuring? Computers do different things differently, so deciding what to measure is just as important РІР‚вЂњ if not more so РІР‚вЂњ than the actual measurements.Р”Р„pple clearly felt that designing its own ARM-based chips was better than buying IntelРІР‚в„ўs x86-based processors. Drag racing a couple of CPUs seems easy, but once you get into it you realize itРІР‚в„ўs fraught with problems. ItРІР‚в„ўs natural to try to find out which chip is РІР‚Сљbetter,РІР‚Сњ for some definition of better.

YouРІР‚в„ўll see what you want to see in the benchmark results, and what you take out of the scores is, as Yoda says, РІР‚Сљonly what you take with you.РІР‚СњР”В¬omputer benchmarking, like auto racing, has been around ever since they made the second one. Spoiler alert! ItРІР‚в„ўs a trick question РІР‚вЂњ a Rorschach test.

Which chip is faster: AppleРІР‚в„ўs M1 or IntelРІР‚в„ўs Core i7? The new or the old? ARM or x86? The mobile gadgets company or the major microprocessor maker?

2017 macbook air i7 performance